prplatform

Exercise

Peer-review other group's Corona Tracker architecture

0 / 1 peer-reviews completed.

In this exercise you're peer-reviewing other students' submissions to the exercise Corona Tracker design doc submitted by a group

This exercise was closed on 23.5.2021 23.59

Review is done as a group for another group.
Read the pdf to peer-review, and then answer the questions below

Questions

Review the justifications
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

No justifications at all (0p)

Only a few justifications exist (1p)

Justifications mainly exist but are beside the point (2p)

Justification mainly exist and are quite well to the point (3p)

Justification exist and are mainly appropriate (4p)

Justifications in place, and they are clear and good (5p)

In addition to 5, justifications refer to lecture material, reliable sources or theories in the field (6p)

Short rationale for the justification points (1-3 sentences).
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

Could you implement the design based on the architecture document? The the view of a subcontractor responsible for implementing the system: Would it be possible based on the documentation? What kind of clarifying questions would you ask? How complete is the architecture? Are there any major parts missing? Identify and highlight good architectural choices - write a compact rationale.
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

Requirements change! In vaccinations, there are surplus AstraZeneca vaccines in certain hospitals, since many people are cautious of its risks and refuse taking it. New feature will be added to KoronaVilkku++. It will scan through the people in the area who have not been vaccinated yet and offer free times for AZ vaccinations - earlier in the waiting line. Can this feature be added easily - why/why not? Give a rationale.
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

New speed requirements! Reportedly, some functions of Koronavilkku++ have been too slow, such as checking health status at the entrance of a site, and also getting exposure information quicker should be the target. Check the situation, can the architecture handle adequately the situation of changing speed requirements - why / why not? Give a rationale.
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

You have to enroll to the course in order to submit.
You can enroll from the course page.