prplatform

Exercise

Peer-review other group's design doc

0 / 1 peer-reviews completed.

In this exercise you're peer-reviewing other students' submissions to the exercise Full 4+1 design doc submitted by a group (T-low food delivery)

This exercise was closed on 25.5.2024 12.00

Review is done as a group for another group.
Read the pdf to peer-review, and then answer the questions below

Questions

Review the justifications
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

No justifications at all (0p)

Only a few justifications exist (1p)

Justifications mainly exist but are beside the point (2p)

Justification mainly exist and are quite well to the point (3p)

Justification exist and are mainly appropriate (4p)

Justifications in place, and they are clear and good (5p)

In addition to 5, justifications refer to lecture material, reliable sources or theories in the field (6p)

Short rationale for the justification points (1-3 sentences):
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

Could you implement the design based on the architecture document? The the view of a subcontractor responsible for implementing the system: Would it be possible based on the documentation? What kind of clarifying questions would you ask? How complete is the architecture? Are there any major parts missing? Identify and highlight good architectural choices - write a compact rationale.
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

Requirements change! The analytics department has discovered that your users are not engaged enough with the TLow. You'll need to add gamification elements to it. For example users can socialize and play with either alone or with their friends. Can this gamification be added easily?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

Requirements change! Various other countries are also interested in joining the TLow community. The launch for Sweden and Estonia went without any larger problems. Now also Taiwan shows interest in the software. Can the architecture take advantage of the cloud providers global network of edge locations or in other ways provide low latency world wide? Can the authentication method be changed easily for different countries?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

You have to enroll to the course in order to submit.
You can enroll from the course page.