prplatform

Exercise

Microservices architecture peer review

0 / 1 peer-reviews completed.

In this exercise you're peer-reviewing other students' submissions to the exercise Microservices architecture

This exercise was closed on 10.3.2024 23.59

The essay doesn't have to be multiple pages long as long as it has some thought put into it.
Is microservice architecture understood correctly?
Are there both pros and cons present?

Questions

Is microservice architecture understood correctly? Example list of main points to help with grading: Highly maintainable and testable, loosely coupled with other services, independently deployable, capable of being developed by a small team, services communicate with each other by using well-defined APIs, data and fault isolation, possible to mix technologies, etc etc
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

Main points are not present or are understood incorrectly

few of the main points are missing. Architecture is misunderstood.

Most of the main points are present. Architecture is understood at some level.

Are pros and cons sensible? Example pros: fault isolation, can mix technologies, easier to understand, faster deployments, scalability. Example cons: complex communications, hosting requires more resources, problems are harder to debug, deployments are more complex, integration testing is more difficult
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

No pros or cons present or they are misunderstood.

Some pros and cons present but they might be somewhat arguable.

Sensible pros and cons.

After considering pros and cons of your peer-reviewee's essay, what would you change in your own essay?
Peer-reviewed will see this answer*

You can make this text area bigger from the bottom-right corner!

You have to enroll to the course in order to submit.
You can enroll from the course page.